You Don't Know What "Democracy" Is, Because You've Never Lived In A Country Without It.

My views on politics and life in general are pretty simple: "Everyone has the right to govern their own lives and are also responsible for what they do." Of course this is an extremely oversimplified statement, but at the heart of my thinking, that is it. The individual is free to do what they want and they must owner what they do. But It seems that today people are yearning for the exact opposite, rather than freedom, they want more "guidelines". There are now more socially implied  rules and it is much easier, at least from my perspective, to step over some politically correct boundary. What is going on here? Globally, societies seem to be throwing away the idea of democracy. They may call it something else in the media but I think that's what it boils down to. You just need to look at what is going on in the United States right now to see how polarized the liberal and conservative camps are becoming. It doesn't matter the topic either. There is less true debate and more justification of why any particular viewpoint is correct. It is almost as though every idea is being approached as though it were a sales pitch, literally a commercial. Rather than discussing a viewpoint or position, individuals are selling their point of view. There is no discussion and interaction involved.

Don't take democracy for granted. The "Good Old Days" were not as good as you remember.

Democracy and the responsibilities that brings with it are being thrown away bit by bit. My concern is that the people doing the "throwing away" don't know what their giving up because they've always had it. Some of you reading this paragraph may say "Patrick, don't be ridiculous. It will never get that far." My response to them would be "Look at the world. Look at how polarized people have become in their viewpoints." There seems to be far less a willingness to discuss and debate any issue now days we seem to go straight for the extreme.

On 11 February 1990 Nelson Mandela made
his first public speech, after 27 years in jail.
Source: South Africa Gateway.
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Is this because modern communication systems have taken face-to-face meetings and interactions out of discourse? Instead of dealing with a real person in a group, the debate is happening over a video chat? Which takes out that small but very important responsibility involved with dealing with someone personally, physically in the same space. They used to  call this  video chat side effect "The Ivory Tower"; it meant that the person was out of touch with the topic and not seeing the broader picture. I think this might be what is happening today with society. Therefore it becomes easy to complain about democracy or any other concept because people are seeing it only from their own ivory tower. It is very much like dealing with someone over the phone rather than a person. When you are right there with the individual there are many more subtle cues and motivations. The two people may understand the issue much more thoroughly, because meeting in person brings the topic alive for them. They still may not agree, but there is much more understanding and I bet her list of the tendency to become polarized on the issue at hand.

The bottom line is: People need to gather in person more. To rebuild those connections that originally brought societies together and allowed sincere debates to occur without the dangers involved in thinking in extremism terms. It's a slower process absolutely. But everyone wins no matter what the outcome because dealing with people face-to-face makes you acknowledge the humanity and the complexity. People are stronger emotionally and I believe intellectual as well.

Whereas with the Internet and other communication media it is far easier to write your comment, click the submit button and off you go to somewhere else. You can't do that in real life. You have to deal with whatever the issue is, with the people right there with their comments and rebuttals. Everybody comes out of this real-life experience with them far richer understanding.

As far as democracy goes, debated with someone in real life. Meet with them over time. Go through the pros and cons of not only democracy but any other system you can think of. Then you will know what it is like to live without it or at least have some depth on the topic.

Take care Patrick.

Has humanity begun to think globally, or are we still thinking like a tribe?

1915 World map
Click to enlarge

Photo by Patrick Barry License: CC BY-SA 2.0

Are we used to the big picture yet?

By "The Big Picture" I mean the world and to some extent beyond. Humanity is come a long way in the last 200 years. New hardware and technologies of bound, it really is quite cool to see some of the things that can be done and part of me would like to live for another 200 years to see what the human race gets up to.

However, many of us individually as well as on a societal level are still perceiving things as though we were still a small tribe, the "us versus them" mentality. Human beings naturally have a individual sense of self and a fairly early age but when it goes beyond that to the groups of human beings you interact with there is indeed a problem. It simply doesn't work anymore, and as a matter of fact it is getting rather dangerous to think in terms of one group versus another one. This only promotes stratification and a lot of the problems we are now seeing.

We have to begin to develop more rapidly socially, to be not just politically inclusive but begin to go beyond the old models. I find myself wondering what if a map of the world never had borders or even countries drawn on it, and further to that, what if there was no concept of a country. We would still develop individually and personality wise but we would not have imposed divisions. This is of course emphasized when we are quite young and forms the bedrock of a lot of our thinking and perceptions, to the point where it is hard to conceive of any other system on good old planet Earth for the human race. It makes sense that humanity had to develop this way initially, we were small groups split apart from others geology. There was simply no other way to survive and no master blueprint, no common anything, pretty much. But we can't afford to take a thousand years for our social norms to catch up. Indeed the idea of "society" will have to change fundamental because within the current definition is it built in division. And along with society politics will go through a similar situation... If one can ever truly unravel one from the other.

So I answered my own question: We are indeed still thinking like a tribe. But there are little indications that this may be beginning to change. I have seen this at meetings and when dealing with people individually and as a group. We are a little more aware… Just a little more… But the beginning is clear. The old and new behaviours are running in parallel right now. Man I would really like to see the world in 200 years. I would probably be completely confused. But then again knowing myself, I would adapt.

So any speculation on what society (for lack of a better word) will evolve into in that time? Post your thoughts here.

Take care and have an excellent day.

Are We Trading Off Our Emotional Intelligence to Automation?

 

We are at an interesting point of time, the Internet is still evolving along with the technology that supports it and I'm wondering if we are losing specific skill sets to automation. This may sound like the old headline "Millions Unemployed Due to Robots In Workforce!" but it is not. That has to do with physical activities. This time I would like to consider psychological and emotional skills.

When handheld calculators became popular in the 1970s, I remember clearly them being immediately banned in school. Anyone found with one, was in serious trouble. The reason was obvious, a bunch of kids would of course use them to get the answers to all the math questions you could think of. But, all of us in school at the time could do the math in our heads, we just didn't want to especially since there was an easier option and that was the calculator. The key point here is that we already had a skill established. So the calculator was an option, for those of us sneaky enough to get around the embargo.

But suppose one had access to the calculator from the earliest days of school. We would never have developed the ability to do math in our heads. That's a really important skill and if you generalize a little bit there is a real ripple effect, because we are talking about the brain actually exercising itself. Learning how to make pathways between the neurons. Remembering phone numbers, was another mental activity which everyone undertook. You always knew your best friend's phone number and now no one needs to do that. If we begin to multiply the effect of not being responsible for these activities are there critical aspects of brain and mind development which the current generation is being deprived of?

With the beginnings of artificial intelligence being combined with search engines on the Internet, we are looking at machines that can actually do the research on almost any given topic for us. Once that evolves and matures, how much thinking will the average person really have to do? This is bound to have a major impact on the whole person as a whole. They might never develop the skills needed for deeper understanding of a subject or indeed their relationship to others. It goes way beyond problem-solving skills. From my perspective it impacts the very process of thinking and understanding in their most fundamental forms.

History is demonstrated that we lose skills pretty quickly, if they are not in regular use. I have met people who do not know how to deconstruct a problem as the first step in finding answers to the issue. Without Google they stop dead in their tracks and are absolutely at loss as to what and how to break something down into its constituent parts. My own math skills have degraded to a pretty abysmal level now days as well, but at least I know how to get them back. I did the exercise once and can do it again because I have the fundamental groundwork and history to build upon.

But if you don't have that in the first place and especially if you haven't learned it early in life that makes starting off learning these skills a very difficult task and to some extent on the finer points may be impossible. So how does this impact the whole human being? More importantly how do we ensure that this does not happen, so that people today and tomorrow will have the fundamental building blocks needed for life. The first solution I can think of is that people must be introduced to certain aspects of technology only once they've demonstrated that they have the groundwork and mental experience necessary for going without it if need be. A "License to use Google". Even though it sounds ridiculous something like this needs to be put in place on some level when we deal with automation and devices which remove us from the responsibility of learning and growing.

The following is pure conjecture on my part:
I find myself also wondering if this has even broader impacts. A mind that is underused, that has fewer neural connections solidly wired, may indeed have less of a margin for the actual process of thinking and therefore may be susceptible to various disabilities later in life.

On the other hand, would it be possible, or would the brain actually take this offloading of tasks as an opportunity to evolve in different directions? I mean usually when you deprive the brain and mind of activities there is a natural tendency to fill that empty space with something.

Let's see now if we follow the "fill the empty space with something ", train of thought where does that lead? Well, cell phones have pretty much meant we don't need to remember phone numbers and the same with calculators we don't need to do basic math, so is there anything we've expanded ourselves with, have we developed any new attributes, subtle though they may be? Most of us multitask every day now. Is that a gain or loss? It's really hard to say. I mean historically if we look back we have gained immensely from the use of technology. But this time it's different because we are dealing with some of the aspects that actually form the personality and psyche of the individual.

There are more questions posed in this article, then answers that's for sure. Let me know what you think. This could really open up to an ongoing discussion and as you can see after I thought about it some more I have made a video. So take a peek at it if you like. As of this writing it may not be available publicly on YouTube yet and may be difficult to find when it is because I only have two videos up there at the moment. Nevertheless enjoy and comment.

Take care Patrick

Nurturing the Creative Soul

  Truly creative people are indeed a gift to the human race. 

Think of all the beautiful things and unbelievable ideas that have come down through the centuries.

These, artisans and creative thinkers should never be taken for granted however. The people that I've met that fall into this category share a few things in common, which must be acknowledged and paid attention to by the world.

1. Because they go outside of the normal everyday thinking, they are often considered "quirky or eccentric". That's because from a normal perspective they are, and more importantly I think they need to be. It is the very characteristic that helps them to be so creative in the first place. Don't ask them to conform to normal. Rather enjoyed their difference and learn from them.
   
   
2. Their life is likely to be more complicated, as they try to figure out who they are. They may come at things from a very different perspective. This "figuring out" stage may last a long time or perhaps an entire life. Again they are exploring. Give them the room to do that.There may not be as socially acceptable role model for them. They may have to blaze a new trail and create a model for themselves.
   
   

   

   Image generated by Ideogram AI.
   I had to post this 😀. It resulted from simply
   inputting he first paragraph of this article.
   Quite amazing! **  (See end of article note.)

   
   
3. They may not be politically correct (and honestly this is a trait I admire). They may say things directly or point out things that are are uncomfortable. Why?… Because they see things in a different and often broader perspective. They themselves are feeling the pressure of society asking them to be normal. They are willing to rock the boat, both politically and socially.
   
   
4. They may seem abrupt, or outwardly not care about things that the rest of us do. To some extent depending on what you're talking about this may be true but it is also likely that it is just not part of their focus. One of the things that makes a creative soul so great is they are incredibly passionate about what they do and that can mean that anything outside of that realm falls off in relevance quite quickly. For example a friend of mine who is an absolute networking and computer technology genius, but has a very limited range of interests outside of their field. Not because of underexposure but rather because they sincerely don't see the relevance to them. They will deal with other things outside of their realm when they need to but such appearances will be brief and they will hand off whatever the issue is once it is fixed to someone more acquainted with whatever the topic is.
   
   
5. Especially now days, when there is so much going on and so much feedback from everything. Creative souls may need to pull back and spend time alone or doing exclusively what they like to do. Consider this a mandatory recharge cycle, except that it may not happen on a regular basis. When you see this happen to your dear smart friend take it is a signal to pull back a bit and give them some room. Let them know that it's okay for them to do whatever they need to do.
   
   
6. There is a tendency for creative souls to get overextended. That is because they see so much, understand so much, and up helping out everywhere. Or at least can feel like that to them. They can be a prime candidate for burnout, because they really to care about what matters to them. They feel a responsibility to see things through. So they have a habit of not stopping and resting when they should. (I speak from experience.)
    
7. They may change. The very thing that makes them unique may also mean that at some point in their lives they may turn a corner and entirely embraced something new. "Standardization" is not in the vocabulary. Remember, you may love them because they are "out there", but be prepared for that definition to change. If they are a musician for example they may abruptly all of a sudden one day decides to take up pottery and put down music forever as an activity. They frequently are explorers and this is just part of their life.

Now to be clear. -- I am not saying that creative souls should be able to act or do anything absolutely they want. If you see someone who's obviously in trouble or avoiding issues they need to deal with then obviously have a talk with them. But also understand their issues may be complicated and take some time to work out.

Finally, while there are no absolutes or hard guidelines here. The rest of us need to embrace the differences the creative souls portray, because discovery is often the result of being unique. The world will always need this and so will you manage. If you have a quirky creative friend in your life count yourself lucky. Appreciate them now, and don't take them for granted.

Take care Patrick 

** NOTE: The picture "Image generated by Ideogram AI" displayed midway through this article is from the service Ideogram AI.  As a layperson, I have read their relevant "terms of service" and determined, to the best of my ability, that the image may be viewed by the public.  However before any reuse, please review fully their terms and if necessary contact the company for more information.

The use of said image does not imply any affiliation or endorsement.

Are We Daydreaming Our LivesAway?

 "Think about all the time in one's daily life we as a modern society are absorbed in the attention we give twirl electronic devices." 

Putting aside for the moment what happens after one dies, and let's assume for this little question that you only live once, each moment in one's life is unique, and never to be repeated. On the surface this is something everyone knows and acknowledges. Now think about all the time in one's daily life we as a modern society are absorbed in the attention we give twirl electronic devices. I bit the average for most people is several hours a day. Next time you take public transit have a look around and you will see many people, almost mindlessly quietly interacting with their phones and other devices. There is also a good majority of people with earbuds completely tuning out the world, and to some extent reality.

This is a completely new situation for the human animal, at least that's how I see it. We may be closer to the original themes of the Mattrix movie then anyone would care to admit. Riding home today on transit I was struck by how quiet it was and no one was really making eye contact. Faces buried in the various devices… You could tell most people were just trying to make it home and ignore the current boring reality by distracting themselves. But what made the event boring? Everyone reading this knows the answer, it was boring because no one was interacting. I wonder how conscious people on my train were of this fact. It's over an hour ride from Vancouver to Surrey British Columbia each way twice a day. When you work it out that it's over 730 hours a year if one were to do this every day that would add up to an entire month. Which is just gone… A month of adventure, a month of discovering, a month of being loved and loving. All missed because we are distracted. The human lifespan is not all that long, and even when they manage to extended to 150 years with the coming technologies in the scheme of things that still short.

Your entire life, is a one time event, which just happens to take 80 or so years to unfold. And even if there is a glorious afterlife for humanity it will be different than this reality. There will be things you miss, because it just won't be the same.

Before the masses were so distracted people worked together, played and occasionally had arguments together. Indeed, they did also two things together, and the human being at heart have evolved to do just that, in concert with one another or with the group. Not alone. Even introverted people when you examine their lives closely have a few cherished connections throughout their lifespan. They may indeed understand the topic better than most of us because the quiet introverted people I know cherish their realities and are usually not caught up in distraction. For some of them the world is too real, and so they pull away for a while. For the rest of us we need to find a balance between these two extremes. Cherish being aware of every moment whenever you can. It never does repeat.

The above few paragraphs just occurred to me as I was travelling home tonight and I wanted to get them down "on the modern equivalent of paper". Comments are welcome of course.

Patrick Clark

One foot inside the Matrix

In the movie The Matrix the story and plot revolve around the idea that people live in the dream world created by machines. This solution has a purpose, to keep individuals and entire populations distracted and self-involved. This stops humanity from rebelling and facing the all the truth that humanity only exists as if energy source to power the machines. Indeed, when one of the secondary characters is freed from the dream they ultimately make a deal with the machines to once again enter the dream world, despite knowing the truth about why humans are kept alive. The movie was a smash hit.

In the last few years I have begun to wonder just how close we are in reality to the matrix concept and what rights, freedoms, and responsibilities societies as a whole might be unwittingly giving up in exchange for evermore intoxicating technology, which on the surface seems to make one's life easier, but in so doing also forms and alters our  behaviour. In doing so our perceptions of what is acceptable, and normal are altered . Are we as a society becoming more apathetic and easier to manage? The question may not be as outlandish as it first seems. I recently saw a documentary on Dr. Martin Luther King which vividly recounted the early civil rights struggle and specifically the year-long boycott, by the Afro-American community, of riding public buses. This was a nonviolent response to the accepted norm of having segregated public transit. What was amazing was, not only were thousands of people in revolt, but the community kept up the pressure for a continuous year before the issue was resolved. This was not the end of people struggle for basic human rights, just one of many chapters, in a struggle which continues to this day in a variety of ways across many communities. But have societies in large lost the ability to have such long term focus and foresight? The rapid feedback we all expect from everyone and everything in the modern world seems to on the surface have shortened our attention span and sense of what a long struggle is. If the civil rights movement started today with it gather and sustain such momentum, or would people get distracted after a few weeks? Allowing the issue to become lost. Which stagnates change and the growth of people.

I have seen quite a few things in the last years, which would make my personal answer "Yes.", And hence the title of this blog entry "One foot inside the Matrix". Before we can extract our foot. We must first clearly understand the subtle ways in which people are subtly (and sometimes not) encouraged to join this this Matrix Of Behavior.

That is what this ongoing blog entry will be about. Comments are always welcome.